• Beta
  • Open Beta Version 3.6.0

peter You mean you would rather like to create 16 measure long audio regions by default? In most cases you have to adjust start and beginning afterwards anyway. So 4 measures seemed like a sensible default length for me.

No, the default can be anything; maybe your 4-measures is best. (I'm yet to test actually creating a region based on bpm, but will test that later today.)

Just wondering if I were to go setting regions with bpm and beats versus selecting a region by ear and waveform spikes as I do now, would it then make sense to have some controls over the number of beats? (Such as a quick way to double/halve region length, etc.)

Peter after some playing around , i have realized some things that i never considered and ithink its well worth bashing out as it is most important we get the logic of operation perfect for on stage use everything else will fall in to place.
I know i suggested a single tap to enable a loop and another single tap on that loop while its playing enables the permanent loop option, and yes this seems good but it also creates a limitation to other important ways of operation.
Perhaps if i mention them you might reconsider a long press for activating/deactivating a permanent loop.
As you select a loop you should be able to deselect a loop just as easy,once you have selected a loop and a new play point is created a deselection of that loop should alwas go back to the last playhead position as you have changed your mind , at the moment you have it so you are locked in to that first selection, this is BAD , when i load a song it is cued up from start if i press a loop point i want to start from i have no choice now i am stuck on that starting point, but if i deselect that loop i should be able to start from the begining of song .
By keeping to a simple consistant logic you can give us a lot of freedom yet keep things very easy, by introducing, perhaps we can still keep the single touch on the now playing loop but we need to think of outside the loop freedom as well.
So the question is, can we make it so while i am playing or not playingthe a song we have full freedom to easily choose what we want?
I think we can we just have to think in different ways untill we cant push the system anymore.

Some logic thoughts.
I load my song the first loop starts 3 seconds in as that was the best looping point as it has intro instrument part that does not make a good loop or perhaps it has a count in i have left out of the loop, the point is if i select that loop it will leave out this front area but if i now change my mind and deselect this loop it wont go back to my beginning now this logic needs to change, this applies to all other loops especially when in stop mode as you could be paused in the middle of a non looped section and then you choose a loop then you change your mind and deselect it you would expect to return back to the old non looped play point, this should apply to any amount of loops you engage the bottom line is if no loops are engaged you allways return to the last non looped song position, this gives you freedom to selelect and deselect loop points but still keep your paused position if you end up not choosing to use loops at all and just continue.

Going back to single selecting logic, what i think would work better.
Permanent looping feature is not really the bees nees way of looping as i dont see the point of permanently looping a point you have to get off it eventually, but what i find usefull is perhaps singly repeating a section to either repeat it cause the crowd loves it or extend it so you can show off with your solos, so a better way of doing this is just selecting the same part again this creates a single loop and does not make you do another foot switch to turn off permanent loop, which could be dangerous because you are so engrosed in your solo you forget to turn it off, so my idea os a single tap to choose a loop and another tap not to choose it works much better because you dont get a permanent loop point option poping up to confuse the flow, a permanent loop on foot switches is still available for eveyone to choose but it also allows others to just use the select switch to choose the same loop your on and they end up with a single repeat , because its so easy to do this they can do this a few more times but knowing if we do nothing at the end of the loop it will get of the loop automatically , i think this gives freedom to everyone whichever way they might preffer.
But the operation on the interfaces is much better as you single tap to choose the same loop area it repeats once and moves on but if you select it again but change your mind you can undo it at the moment you would create a permanent loop instead but this is not really that hard to do with a long press if you really need a permanent loop, its almost better to make it a bit harder because you dont want accidental permanent loop to happen as it could be embarrasing, so i would rather have really easy single selection/deselection than permanent loop popping up when you dont want it.
I hope i have described things clearly , the idea is to make ST3 simple , powerful and easy to use and to please the majority of users.

Permanent loop is not something a lot of users would need but a single repeat function is very usefull, both functions are perfectly available on the foot pedals but i feel as though on the interfaces the operational logic is not perfect.it could be easier.

    Damir Does anyone else have an opinion about this? Should a running playback be stopped the moment you start moving a region border and be replaced by the scrubbing preview?

    I really like the scrubbing preview. The purpose of this screen is to find the region borders and as it is it is focused on doing that. It plays the loop when you leave it alone. Maybe there should be other buttons in-line with the play button to enable/disable loop preview mode, then play can just play without being interrupted with preview mode off. Also play then wouldn't need to start when you move the markers with playback is off unless you turned preview on.

    Damir Permanent loop is not something a lot of users would need but a single repeat function is very usefull, both functions are perfectly available on the foot pedals but i feel as though on the interfaces the operational logic is not perfect.it could be easier.

    As a singer/guitarist, the initial way I see myself using loops is to extend a guitar solo IF I feel the need to at the time. I realise this is a very simple use for loops. The two default options I could use are NO LOOP or INFINITE LOOP, and a pedal would have to be assigned to toggle. I have tested this and it works very well. I can't see myself favouring a single loop. If that were the case, I'd edit my backing track. For people who buy backing tracks and would like to lengthen sections, they'd probably want to enter a fixed number to the loops. As music performance is very creative, there is no best way to do this.

      MasterAnt as i said the foot pedal control is really good it gives users operational flexability, my point was only talking about the interface control of the single select function that gets tangled up with permanent loop function, a single tap to select all loop sections and the ability to single tap to deselect is most important especially in stop mode.
      To me a long press to activivate/deactivate permanent loops is safe and reasonably easy it also is not in my face because i rather use the select method to create a loop this gives me confidence the loop will end and i can move on without further interaction but it also gives me that instentanious freedom to loop again or not to loop again, meaning i dont have to plan i can just create on the run with one button push not two button pushes or two pedal control, i can achieve all i want with one thing and one push, this is freedom.

      This is what i think would work better on stage, please ignore the exact colour choice or text size or colour this is just a simple alternative example.
      The idea is to make everything as much in your face as possible so it can be easily seen at a distance or on an Iphone.
      In loop mode we are not really interested in the waveform its all about jumping around the song with ease, flexability, speed.
      Any other views? I just want a big smile on our faces everytime we get on stage.
      Cheers Damir

      MasterAnt that’s how I think a lot of singer guitarist would use it me included and the foot pedal is setup perfect for this , I am talking about the interface finger\mouse control on the devices even though it’s good now it still feels like it’s not perfect when you look at it from many different ways of operation.
      This might have to be ironed out later when people start using it and finding out the frustrations so I’m trying to minimise these issues before hand but it’s hard with minimal use to fully test.
      I think making a loop is most important issue at the moment this needs to be simple quick and accurate.
      Cheers Damir

      Hi Peter, how do you highlight peoples responses then respond again, i thought you only had the power to do this, but ive noticed others are doing it, how is that done?

      Thanks Damir

      I already told you how to do it:

      peter Oh my god please please please use the Quote button when quoting something. It is not possible to distinguish what you are quoting and what you write yourself. Just mark the text and tap on the quote button:

        Regarding the toggling of the loop feature. The way it is now is actually working quite well in my opinion: A tap on the currently playing region toggles the loop setting for that region. So while you are playing you can decide whether you want to loop the current section up until the end of that region. The pedal action works the same. It will toggle the loop of the currently playing region.

        A tap on any other region will select or deselect it.

          peter sorry Pete dont forget i just discovered the undo function in lyrics edit after a lot of years of pain, so if its not in my face i dont know about it, also i havent used forums before, i dont wast time easily but believe ST3 justifies it, if something is worth doing its worth doing well.
          Thanks il give it a shot next time.

          peter yes it works a lot better now , i think what im not happy with is when you are in stop mode selecting loops does not highligt them it seems to work ok in play mode but not in stop mode.

            Damir i think what im not happy with is when you are in stop mode selecting loops does not highligt them

            Then you will really enjoy the next update 😃

              Loop creation feedback.
              I did a comparison between Twisted Wave app and ST3b
              Same song, same loop point.
              Twisted wave is very fast and accurate i had a perfect loop in no time.
              ST3 didnt do a good job no matter how much effort i put in to it and it felt awkward, it was fighting me along the process and at the end i could not perfect the loop.

              So my suggestion is have a good look at how Twisted Wave does it.
              It has a waveform above so you can travel through the song fast, and another larger waveform is where you complete the edit, but because you can zoom in so much it makes it easy to perfect the loop, the grab handles are nice and obvious and the edit point lines are nice and thin so you can accurately place the edit points, i believe it actually can zoom in too much , while ST3 cant zoom in enough.The audio and visual sync is very tight you actually feel every movement of loop points this perfectly represents what is on screen and what you are hearing, it feels very professional while ST3 hasnt got a good workflow and feels very loose in operation the end result is not perfect and you waste a lot of time getting an average loop result, this definitely needs a bit more tweaking.

              Suggestion,
              Get rid of unnecessary stuff, like the two time location indicators that you can play around with that have no great value to complete a loop.
              Increase the waveform area as much as possible and shrink the delete , loop button, colour choice and rename to the bottom of the window, dont let anything be hidden.
              There needs to be an accurate time display in the waveform so you know where you are.
              Introduce a loop on off switch next to play button and a reset to start point / end point buttons so you can precisely position the playhead to begining of loop.
              When you select a loop it is immediately cued to begining and plays through.
              The loop functio button should have two modes one as normal loop from start to end, the second loop function should be the edit loop function loop which starts 10 seconds before the end of loop plays through to begining of loop for another 10 seconds then it provides a two second silence gap and plays over and over till you are happy with the end result, if your loops are shorter than 22 seconds it just loops as normal because its a short loop , the idea is if you have longer loops you dont have to listen through the whole long loop to hear the edit points it makes it quick and easy to just be creative.
              The reason i would have a two second gap is if the music is very similar it is hard to destinguish where the loop point is if it sounds perfect.
              All these little things make creating a good loop point very easy and fast, at the moment there is no fast logic everything is clunky and awkward.
              Twisted wave is a great example of a well thought of app designed for users that dont like wasting time, so its a good referance point.
              OK! ive had my say from now on its bug reports only.
              Thanks all
              Damir

              peter Now i wont be able to sleep, youre like father xmas, delivering presents every day 😂

              Then you will really enjoy the next update 😃
              I am trying this Quote thing!
              I wonder if its worked?

              peter Then you will really enjoy the next update 😃

              Ok here i go again, has this worked?
              Stop laughing

                Damir Ok i think i got this , thanks and good night 😭😵‍💫

                Yes, you got it 👍

                WOW!!! A perfect loop! I set the BPM to match my song and hit + and my loop was perfect... (I'm being serious; I was impressed!) Except it didn't start on the beat. Now how do I move my perfect 4-bar loop to the correct starting spot? I naturally expect to be able to pick up the region and move it left and right, but that doesn't work. I feel like I'm in BPM mode where the controls should be BPM related. In BPM mode, dragging the left/right indicators could snap to beats, since you already know how far that is in milliseconds. Now that would be lightning fast loop creation! But then there are times when you want to be in TIME mode and adjust with the +- buttons...

                Looking forward to what you have in store for the next update... 🙂