MusicMan81 I think I had a similar sentiment when I saw the feature, along with trepidation around the fact that "apply to similar" didn't give me any control, I don't know what the matching logic is, and there doesn't appear to be a way to roll back if it gets it wrong. As a result, I want to use it, but probably won't.... yet.
I am extremely diligent and generally consistent in laying out:
- What 'function' each track 'does', i.e. Track 1 is always Backing Tracks, Track 2 is always Clicks & Cues, Track 3 is always Guide Vocal. Equally, not every song in my collection has a Track 3. Some might even start getting a track 4 as I add in an additional guitar track. So there will be track inconsistency.
- The audio file name always contains the 'function', i.e. Backing Track file name always has the word 'Music' immediately followed by a tempo (e.g. (t=120)), Click and Cues file name always contains the word 'Click&Cues' immediately followed by a tempo (e.g. (t=120))
So rather than relying on some fuzzy logic that I don't understand (yet. It's not like we've given Peter time to explain it!), and can't control, I would rather see a batch change engine where I have some control over words/phrases that are matched, and/or the Track number(s) the operation is applied to, etc.
I know this is the first iteration, so we are jumping ahead of things a bit. Definitely not having a crack at this, more a case of excited to see it and want to see some additional functionality before I risk using it.
I've used a lot of these types of 'mass batch processing' type tools in my IT life, and I also like to see a tool that at least shows an example of how your input will be processed on screen (this might not be practical on an iOS device). As I'm a little paranoid about irreversible operations, I'd even go as far as liking to see a 'test run' feature that spits out a log file of what would be 'operated on' and what the before and after would look like so I check check and validate before hitting 'Go'.
Now, I also appreciate that getting track naming wrong is not a 'destructive' process, and doesn't stop me using ST and playing my songs. It is really just mislabeling something which is not the end of the world. So, yes, I get it, I'm being overly paranoid and conservative.